top of page

ree

Ziya Tong’s The Reality Bubble explores how humans are blind to the natural world, the inner workings of our society, and even the technologies we’ve created. These tools, while meant to help us understand our world, often end up confining us.

I found the book incredibly entertaining and eye-opening from multiple perspectives.


As a designer focused on visual communication, I’ve long been aware that humans can only perceive a limited range of colors. But the book broadened my perspective by showing how animals experience the world differently. Some species, thanks to extra photoreceptor cones in their eyes, can see ultraviolet light or detect a wider spectrum of colors. While we often assume animals are less intelligent than humans, they actually outperform us in unique ways. For instance, scientists have discovered that certain species of fish can recognize and differentiate between human faces.


Plants also possess a form of intelligence. Trees communicate through underground root and fungal networks, warning each other about dangers or sharing nutrients. Tong supports this idea with scientific evidence, including a quote from the chapter “I to Eye”:

“Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors.” (p. 95)

As a mother of two, the chapter “Recipe for Disaster” was especially jarring. It reveals just how disconnected we are from the origins of our food, and how we often choose not to know. Only twelve plant species and five animal species make up three-quarters of the global food supply. The cruelty embedded in industrial food systems is something we rarely question.

I was also surprised to learn that much of our drinking water doesn't come from rain or snowmelt, as I had assumed, but from ancient underground reserves. This "fossil water" is a key resource for modern agriculture.


The book also unpacks the reality behind factory farming, a term that can sound deceptively neutral. Gustavus Franklin Swift, a Chicago meatpacker, invented the conveyor belt system still used today. In his system, every part of the animal was commodified. Guts became tennis racket strings, fat was used in soap, bones were turned into fertilizer, and hooves became glue. When I told my 7-year-old daughter that the gelatin in her gummy bears comes from animal bones, skins, and connective tissues, she was shocked and disgusted.

“Cognitive dissonance is really just a name for the discomfort we feel when we both know something and avoid knowing it.”

Humans consume and waste on a massive scale, often without realizing how this impacts our ecosystem. We believe we own and control nature, but what does ownership really mean? If we claim a piece of land, do we also claim the trees and wildlife within it?


Tong argues that our blind spots extend beyond biology and society to the foundations of our civilization. We invented time, measurements, and social rules for convenience, but these constructs also imprison us.


As a Geographic Information Systems student, I found Chapter 8, “Space Invaders,” particularly intriguing. It prompted me to reconsider something as basic as a meter or an inch. I learned that a meter is scientifically defined as:

“a length equal to 1,650,763.73 wavelengths of the orange light emitted by the krypton-86 atom in a vacuum.”

That was a fun fact I’ll never forget.

The book shows how even abstract systems like borders, maps, or units of space can shape conflicts, enforce inequality, and divide the rich and the poor. These artificial boundaries deeply affect our social and economic lives.


Tong ends the book by highlighting three major blind spots in our life-support system: where our food comes from, where our energy comes from, and where our waste goes. In an age when cameras are everywhere, these areas remain hidden, often by design.

ree

 
 
 

Updated: Jun 5

Life engages all our senses. Humans experience the world through sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell.


Recently, I visited Niagara Falls. As the water thundered down and mist filled the air, I was struck by how powerful and exhilarating it felt—something no photo or video had ever conveyed to me. Media often captures sight and sound, but not the full sensory experience.

ree

In the 21st century, most digital interfaces rely heavily on vision. But I’ve always appreciated the more tactile and auditory aspects of interaction. I enjoy pressing physical buttons and tuning into the radio.


While my kids, ages four and seven, are growing up comfortably talking to Alexa, I’m still wired to interact with the world through touch. That’s why I love using the New York Times Audio app. I use it to listen to podcasts, music, and news. Recently, I heard on a podcast that people in my generation (30s to 40s) are increasingly turning to audio content.


Even ChatGPT recently launched a new feature that lets you talk to an AI agent by phone (available in the U.S. and Canada as of June 4, 2025). I wonder if this is part of a broader shift, an experiment in designing new types of interfaces.


I started my career designing mobile apps, websites, and digital screens. Back then, my title was GUI (Graphical User Interface) designer. Interestingly, one of my major projects involved designing finger gestures for touchscreens not just the visuals, but how users would feel their way through digital content.


Interfaces keep evolving. Still, I enjoy the tactile rituals of reading paper books, doodling, and writing with pens, just as much as using digital tools.


 
 
 

Updated: Jun 9

From sketching wireframes by hand to generating full mockups with AI, the evolution of prototyping has changed how I design—and how I think.


When I started my career as a UI designer for mobile apps and websites, I never imagined how rapidly design tools would advance. Now, whenever I talk about how I worked even just a decade ago, it feels like I’m describing a distant era.


Back in 2015, I attended the CHI conference (ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems), where I saw brilliant computer science students presenting their research. One session, in particular, caught my attention—it was about creating websites automatically without a designer. At the time, I thought it was a bit absurd. The demo wasn’t visually impressive, and I dismissed the idea. But here we are in 2025, and those concepts have become reality. Today’s tools can produce professional-level designs in seconds. That experience made me realize how quickly things can change—and it excites me to imagine where we’ll be in five or ten more years.


As a designer, creating visual outcomes has always been at the core of my work. But I’ve also had a strong desire to build things faster and more efficiently.

Over the years, I’ve explored everything from JavaScript and CoffeeScript to R and Esri’s GIS tools—all in service of turning ideas into reality quickly.

Early on, I used JavaScript to create interactive prototypes and learned CoffeeScript with Framer to build playful animated mockups. (Here’s a link to my older design process, written in Korean.)


As I transitioned from B2C to B2B companies, I began designing more complex dashboards filled with charts and data. While working on business intelligence (BI) tools at a finance company, I took data analysis seriously and chose to learn R because it’s open-source and powerful.

Using R, I created charts with the ggplot2 library and explored several packages for dashboards and interactive maps. I even applied R in real projects—like at Johnson Controls, where I worked on a vibration analysis tool to detect motor issues. I was responsible for designing accessible color schemes for complex line charts that clearly communicated critical information.

I’ve always been drawn to unconventional tools to enhance my design process. (Here’s a link to my design work process slides in English.)

How I utilize R programming to rapidly generate Complex Charts

Lately, I’ve been experimenting with AI-powered tools like Lovable and Bolts—exactly the kind of solutions I dreamed of years ago. They help me generate mockups quickly and bring ideas to life interactively.

I’ve even used them to build personal projects and create games for my 7-year-old daughter. While these tools make initial creation easy, iterating and fine-tuning still requires thoughtful effort—just like always.


In a world where anyone can generate a layout in seconds, what do you think makes a designer’s touch truly essential? How do you balance speed with meaningful design?

 
 
 
Miyoung Yoon

© 2024 by Miyoung Yoon

+1-414-712-8361

bottom of page